Two concepts that classical texts describe extensively and define inconsistently. The San Jiao has a function list - it is the passage for fluids and the route by which yuan qi is distributed - but no agreed anatomical seat. Ming Men, the Gate of Life, is placed between the kidneys by most texts and described as the source of original yang; whether it is a separate organ or a function of the Kidney is argued in the literature.
Later authors did not settle the question, they elaborated it. Ming dynasty writing made Ming Men central to a whole school of tonifying practice, which is why the term is still common in clinical conversation even though it maps onto nothing in modern anatomy.
How to read this: the disagreement is not a defect to be corrected. It is what a tradition working from observation and long use, rather than from dissection, looks like. Knowing that a term is contested is more useful than being told a tidy answer.
有两个概念，古籍论述很多，定义却并不统一。三焦有一份功能清单——是水液通行的道路，也是元气布散的途径——但没有公认的解剖位置。命门则被多数文献定在两肾之间，被描述为元阳之本；它究竟是一个独立脏器，还是肾的功能之一，文献中一直有争论。
后世医家并没有解决这个问题，而是把它展开了。明代医著把命门放到补益法体系的核心，这也是它至今仍常出现在临床话语中，却对应不上任何现代解剖结构的原因。
怎么读这类内容：这种分歧不是一个待修正的缺陷，而是一门依靠观察与长期使用、而非依靠解剖建立的传统本来的样子。知道一个术语有争议，比被告知一个整齐的答案更有用。
35 related entries.